Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

High Court Rules Section 313 Statement Not Mandatory in Cheque Bounce Cases When Accused Deliberately Avoids Trial.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC affirmed that in Section 138 NI Act cases, being quasi-criminal in nature ("civil sheep in criminal wolf's clothing"), courts can proceed with trial in accused's absence and dispense with Section 313 CrPC statement if the accused remains willfully absent without justification. The court upheld the Metropolitan Magistrate's conviction order, ruling that mandatory recording of Section 313 statements traditionally required in criminal trials is not strictly applicable to cheque dishonor cases. The absence of accused during evidence stage and non-recording of Section 313 statement does not vitiate trial proceedings when absence is unjustified. Both revision applications challenging the conviction were dismissed, confirming original sentence u/s 138.....