Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions and Related Applications Due to Lack of Legal Grounds for Interference.Maintainability of appeal - it was held by High Court that For the reasons indicated by the court in dismissing the accompanying appeal, the present appeal shall stand dismissed. HELD THAT:- There are no legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.... ... ... Supreme Court Judgment Summary:

In the case presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant, the Supreme Court considered the arguments presented by the counsel for both parties. After reviewing the relevant materials, the Court concluded that there were no "legal and valid ground[s] for interference." Consequently, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions. As a result, all pending applications associated with these petitions were also dismissed. Maintainability of appeal - it was held by High Court that For the reasons indicated by the court in dismissing the accompanying appeal, the present appeal shall stand dismissed. HELD THAT:- There are no legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. Rashtriya Mills Mazdoor Sangh Versus The Off. Liq. of Hon. Bombay High C. & Ors
Companies Law
2016 (2) TMI 1392 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT - SC
Dated:- 23-2-2016
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(S). 760/2014 With SLP(C) No. 1387/2014 - -
Corporate Laws
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant For the Appearing Parties : Mr. Amir A., Adv., Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv., Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Adv., Mr. Ashim Sood, Adv., Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv., Ms. Priyanka Shethy, Adv., Mr. N. Ganpathy, Adv., Mr. Subramanyam, Adv., Mr. Atishi Dipankar, Adv., Mr. K. Sultan Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. V. Hari Pillai, Adv., Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv., Mr. N. Ganpathy, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Sanghi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv., Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Adv., ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following : 1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant material. 2. We do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. 3. Consequently, all pending applications are also dismissed.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders