2025 (1) TMI 1051
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Respondent : Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR. ORDER PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM : These appeals by the assessee are against the respective orders of the Ld. CIT Exemption, Lucknow both dated 19.3.2024 pertaining to assessment year 2024-25. 2. The grounds raised in ITA No. 2464/Del/2024 read as under:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the impugned order ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the Ld. CIT(E) has violated the principles of natural justice by not providing adequate opportunity of being heard and passing a non-speaking order in violation of judicial precedents. 5. The assessee humbly craves leave to add, alter, or delete all or any of the grounds of appeal. 3. The grounds raised in ITA No. 2465....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s and only assisted to attain the charitable objects as specified repeatedly in the form of response to the notice and the detailed submissions made. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the Ld. CIT(E) has violated the principles of natural justice by not providing adequate opportunity of being heard and passing a non-speaking order in violation of judicial precedent....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rder there was a requisition note on the activities of the assessee. He further submitted that assessee duly complied with the same. However, Ld. CIT(E) dismissed the assessee's applications on the ground that supporting documents were not provided. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that there was no requisition of supporting documents, hence, assessee could not provide the same. Ther....
TaxTMI