Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1978 (7) TMI 112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l Secretary to the Government of India]. - Government of India have considered the points raised in the Revision Application and have examined the records of the case. 2. The petitioners have urged that they had applied to work under compounded levy scheme in 1974 for the entire period of 1974-75 sugar year. Their A.S.P. to that effect was accepted by the Supdt. Since the compounded levy scheme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in Notification No. 95/75, dated 30-4-1975 immediately after its issue, they are continuously working under the scheme in its old form in 1974-75 and in revised form in 1975-76. The plea of the petitioners that since their factory stopped working from 11-5-1975 there was no need to apply for working under the compounded levy scheme as required under Notification No. 95/73 is acceptable. However, i....