1975 (8) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Respondent No. 3 imposed a penalty of Rs. 250/- on the petitioner and directed confiscation of 926 Kgs. of tobacco. He also levied duty on 1075 kgs. and odd of tobacco on the ground of irregularities by the petitioner who is a tobacco grower. In consequence of this order, Respondent No. 4 issued an order on 6-8-1971 which is a demand notice for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,401.69P. on 6-12-1971, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat the authorities have power to condone the dealy. Consequently, Respondent No. 1 also dismissed the revision. It is this order of the 1st Respondent that is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Mr. E.D. Nathan appearing for the petitioner attacks the impugned order on the ground that it is not a speaking order. I regret, I cannot accede to this contention. A perusal of the impugned order wou....