2021 (12) TMI 1518
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....OPAL MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND DR. ALOK SRIVASTAVA MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Appellant: Mr. Subodh Prasad Deo and Ms. Rinki Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Balbir Singh (ASG) with Mr. Balaji Subramanian, Mr. Arav Kapoor and Ms. Ishani Banerjee, Ms. Monica Benjamin, Ms. Surbhi Singh, Advocates for Respondents. Ms. Shama Nargis (Deputy Director Law, CCI) ORDER (Virtual Mode) ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsel for the Appellant that the Respondent had also held in the impugned order certain Officials of the aforementioned manufacturing companies and the Director General of AIBA, responsible for the aforesaid Anti- Competitive Conduct and imposed monetary penalties upon such officials under the provisions of Section 48 of the Competition Act, 2022(12 of 2003). The real grievance of the Appellant ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Governments, there is the feasibility that the Appellant or any of the Beer manufacturers could enter into any Anti-Competitive Agreement within the meaning of Section 3(1) of the Act. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant emphatically points out that the Respondent had passed the impugned order in utter disregard of the settled law and provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, as enumerated in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....perused the grounds of the 'Memorandum of Appeal' both on facts and on legal plane and is of the earnest opinion that 'contentious issues' have been raised in the instant 'Appeal', which necessarily require a detailed examination, at the time of final hearing of the 'Appeal'. In view of the above, this 'Tribunal' bearing in mind the primordial fact that the Appellant has preferred the 'instant ....
TaxTMI