TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (1) TMI 457
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Mr Swapnil Newaskar,. For the Respondents: Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma,. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER MS SONAK J) :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. By amending the Writ Petition, the petitioner prayed for a refund of Rs. 6,16,650/-along with interest appl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....not speak about verification of the records, including finding out whether this amount of Rs. 2,89,775/- was indeed deducted by Percept Picture Company Pvt Ltd. 6. The record shows that the Petitioner, through his Advocate, had addressed a representation dated 19 June 2019 seeking a refund of Rs. 2,89,775/- along with interest. Because this representation was not decided, the Petitioner has insti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner has any further material regarding the deductions, the Petitioner is granted liberty to place the same before the concerned Respondent within two weeks from today. The concerned Respondent must hear the Petitioner, consider the material placed by the Petitioner on record, verify the status of deductions, if any, made by Percept Pictures Company Pvt Ltd and the other material available with ....