Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (1) TMI 270

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Present for the Appellant : Shri Rajesh Singh, Authorised Representative Present for the Respondent: Shr A.K. Seth, Advocate ORDER This application is filed by the Revenue seeking rectification of mistake in Final Order No. 55724 of 2024 dated 02.05.2024 passed by this Tribunal. 2. We have heard Shri Rajesh Singh, learned authorised representative ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0. In the light of entire above discussion, the order under challenge is partly set aside i.e. with respect to the reduction of amount of redemption fine and the penalty with respect to carpets. However, the findings with respect to threading bars are confirmed. The appeal is, accordingly, partly allowed." 5. The application for rectification of mistake points out that while part of the reducti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... confiscation of carpets but set aside the confiscation of the threading bars. He reduced redemption fine to Rs. 1,00,000/- and penalty under section 114 (iii) also to Rs.1,00,000/-. In the Final Order, this Tribunal reversed the reduction of redemption fine and penalty with respect to carpets but did not specify by how much these have been enhanced. It is not possible to infer it from the order o....