Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (11) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ew, an impossible view, in our opinion, in the context of the exemption from levy of municipal taxes claimed by the Race Course Club (respondent herein) in respect of 127 acres, 14 goonthas and 95 sq. yards of land along with structures standing thereon, which were sought to be assessed to general tax under section 202 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act (" Act " in short). The respondent boldly contended and, strangely enough, succeeded in convincing the High Court that section 202(1)(b) of the Act was attracted as occupation and user of the property for running horse races and training of horses, etc., constituted occupation and user of the property for a " charitable purpose " within the meaning of the said provision. Now, sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nevolent activity, however charitable a view one takes. It has also to be emphasised that it must be the very activity which is carried on on the property which must be charitable and not the application of the income of such activity. What the High Court has completely failed to realise is that the "occupation " of the land and buildings or the " user " of the land and buildings must be for a " charitable purpose " and that it is altogether irrelevant as to the manner in which the income of the club is utilised. Section 202(1)(b) makes no reference to the question as regards the employment of the income of the club or the purpose for which the income is so employed. Exemption is granted only in respect of buildings which are " solely " ....