Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (1) TMI 135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....00,635.00/- Taxable Turnover determined : Rs. 2,23,00,635.00/- On the verification of the monthly returns revealed in their Form-1 return filed under the CST Act, 1956, the dealer have reported inter-state sales amounting to Rs. 2,23,00,635.00/- as taxable @ 2% concessional rate, and the tax payable has been paid. But no 'C' forms have been filed in support of their claim of concessional rate of tax. In the absence of 'C' forms your claim of concessional rate of tax are proposed to be treated as sales effected under Section 8(2) of the CST Act, 1956, liable to tax at the rate applicable to the sale inside the state @ 14.5%. For the above reasons, it is proposed to levy tax @ 14.5% on all their interstate sales treating the same as falling under Section 8(2) of the CST Act, 1956, as detailed below subject to consideration of objections if any to be filed in this regard. By the dealer after receiving the proceeding and filed his reply with C-Form in the reference 2nd based. Then, examined the Form-C, the revised below mentioned fresh proceeding is passed. C-Form Submitted Details (Some C-Form has involved by the debit note): S. N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and therefore, there is no merits in the Impugned Revision Order. 7. On the other hand, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent would submit that as per Sub-Section 5 to Section 8 of the CST Act, the State Government has to issue a specific notification to exempt a dealer from payment of tax. It is submitted that the above condition is not fulfilled as no notification has been issued under Section 8(5) of the CST Act. That apart, all the requirements laid down in Sub-Section 4 to Section 8 of the CST Act have also not been fulfilled. 8. It is submitted that in absence of specific notification issued under Section 8(5) of the CST Act, the petitioner cannot claim benefit of exemption under the above notification issued under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax (TNVAT) Act, 2006 for local clearance. 9. It is further submitted that the above Notification No.II(1)/CTR/30(a- 2)/2007 (TNGG Extraordinary/March 23, 2007) [G.O.Ms.No.79, Commercial Taxes and Registration (B2) Department dated 23.03.2007] is only intended to exempt the petitioner from payment of Local Tax viz., Value Added Tax under the provisions of the TNVAT Act and therefore would not apply to exem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for a brief period between 01.03.1978 and 28.02.1979. Paragraph 5 from the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., 1996 (83) E.L.T.3(S.C) is reproduced below:- "5. We are inclined to agree with Sri Sobarjee. Entry 84 of List-I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution empowers the Parliament to make a law providing for levy of duties of excise on tobacco and other goods manufactured or produced in India [except, of course, certain goods mentioned therein]. Indisputably, the special excise duty is an excise duty and is relatable to Entry 84. If so, the levy must be on the manufacture or production of goods. That is how the words "goods manufactured or produced in India" in Entry 84 have been understood by this Court throughout. Once the levy is not there at the time when the goods are manufactured or produced in India, it cannot be levied at the stage of removal of the said goods. The idea of collection at the stage of removal is devised for the sake of convenience. It is not as if the levy is at the stage of removal. It is only the collection that is done at the stage of removal. Admittedly, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., and the provisions of such law, including provisions relating to returns, provisional assessment, advance payment of tax, registration of the transferee of any business, imposition of the tax liability of a person carrying on business on the transferee of, or successor to, such business, transfer of liability of any firm or Hindu undivided family to pay tax in the event of the dissolution of such firm or partition of such family, recovery of tax from third parties, appeals, reviews, revisions, references, [refunds, rebates, penalties] [charging or payment or interest,] compounding of offences and treatment of documents furnished by a dealer as confidential, shall apply accordingly. 19. As per Sub-Section (1) to Section 8 of the CST Act, every dealer, who in the course of interstate trade or commerce, sells to a registered dealer goods of the description referred to in Sub-Section (3), shall be liable to pay tax under the Act, which shall be 3% of his turnover or at the rate applicable to the sale or purchase of such goods inside the appropriate State under the sales tax law of that State, whichever is lower. 20. The goods that are referred to in Sub-Section (3) to Section 8....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e deemed to be a dealer liable to pay tax under the sales tax law of the appropriate State, notwithstanding that he, in fact, may not be so liable under that law. 23. As per Sub-Section (2) to Section 8 of the CST Act, the tax payable by any dealer on his turnover in so far as the turnover or any part thereof relates to the sale of goods in the course of interstate trade or commerce not falling within Sub-Section (1), shall be at the rate applicable to the sale or purchase of such goods inside the appropriate State under the sales tax law of that State. 24. Explanation to Sub-Section (2) to Section 8 of the CST Act also makes it clear that a dealer shall be deemed to be a dealer liable to pay tax under the sales tax law of the appropriate State, notwithstanding that he, in fact, may not be so liable under that law. 25. Thus, the rate applicable to sale of purchase of goods inside the appropriate state under the sales tax law of the State is applicable insofar as the turnover or in part thereof which relates to the sale of goods in the course of interstate trade or commerce which does not fall within the purview of Sub- Section (1) to Section 8 of the CST Act. 26. Howeve....