Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (12) TMI 1019

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tral Excise<br>M.S. SONAK & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. For the Appellant: Mr. Karan Adik a/w Ms. Maya Majumdar. For the Respondent: Mr. Prakash Shah (through VC) a/w Mr. Jas Sanghavi (through VC) and Mr. Mohit Raval i/b. PDS Legal. JUDGMENTPER (JITENDRA JAIN J) :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Appellant-Revenue filed this appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....46/- as detailed in Annexure-'X' appended to the SCN alongwith consequential interest and penalties? (iii) Whether the confessional statement is not sufficient corroboration to prove wrong availment of CENVAT Credit by the Respondent?" At the time of the hearing, Mr. Adik learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue has pressed for only Question Nos. 1 and 2 and not Question No.3 3. The s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d benefit of CENVAT credit. The learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue has not challenged this finding of fact as incorrect. Therefore, on this very limited ground since these findings are not challenged and this being a finding of fact rendered by the final fact finding authority, in our view, no substantial questions of law can be said to arise from the impugned Tribunal's order. 5. Second....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Court in paragraphs 6, 8 and 9 of its order and same has not been shows to us has being incorrect or having challenged before the Supreme Court. The Tribunal based on these decisions have stated that it is settled by various High Courts and the Tribunal that even if excise duty is not payable on the product for any reason, but the Assessee has paid the excise duty and said payment is not challenge....