2023 (8) TMI 1588
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d, Adv. Mr. Shubhendu Anand, Adv. Mr. Anant Sangal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Adv. Mr. Arun Pratap Singh Rajawat, Adv. Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Shlok Chandra, Adv. Ms. Bani Dikshit, Adv. Ms. Sristi Mishra, Adv. Mr.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spondent again requested for some time. This Court is of the opinion that having regard to the previous opportunities granted and the circumstance that the petitioner had enjoyed liberty for the last 9 months or so, the request for further extension of time is not reasonable. It is, accordingly rejected. The basis for the FIR in this case was alleged claim for wrongful ITC - which the revenue a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s Court had observed as follows: "3. This Court has depracated imposition of such onerous conditions previously-notably in the recent order in "Subhash Chouhan v. Union of India" (Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2023) decided on 20.01.2023. 4. Following the order in Subhash Chouhan v. Union of India, the condition requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs.2 crores is hereby set aside. Th....
TaxTMI