1974 (4) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1961, made an application to the Appellate Tribunal under the Act for making a reference to this court as provided under section 256(1) thereof. The second appellate order was claimed to have been served on March 6, 1972, and since an application under section 256(1) lies if filed within 60 days thereof, the application for reference filed on May 5, 1972, was claimed to be in time. The Tribunal fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on for a certiorari is directed against the said order. Mr. Mohanty for the assessee contends that when the assessee had taken a definite stand that the date put in the acknowledgment due was a mistake and produced a certificate from the Postmaster of the concerned post office to show that the registered letter was actually delivered on March 6, 1972, an enquiry was called for. The Appellate Tr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d did not choose to rely upon the Postmaster's certificate. According to the learned standing counsel, the entire matter relates to appreciation of evidence with reference to documents. He relies upon a decision of the Supreme Court in, Nagendra Nath Bora v. Commissioner of Hills Division in support of his contention that the jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution is not appellate or r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... discretion vested in the Tribunal required that there should have been an enquiry to find out the truth. If ultimately the assessee's stand turns out to be false, certainly appropriate action against the assessee was called for. But before the assessee's stand could be levelled as erroneous, in our view an enquiry was warranted. Between two competing materials placed before the Tribunal each of w....