Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (12) TMI 129

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....br>GST<br>Honourable Mr. Justice K. Kumaresh Babu For the Petitioner : Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan For the Respondents : Mr. R. Nanda Kumar Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The challenge in this writ petition is to the DRC-07 notice issued by the second respondent herein, wherein a demand had been made in respect of three counts. 2. Heard Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned counsel for the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de the said portion of the DRC- 07 notice. With regard to the other two documents, she would submit that the petitioner had proposed to invoke the amnesty that had been provided by the Department. 4. Countering such argument, Mr.R.Nandakumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, had vehemently contended that there was no error in including the said amount to the demand....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6) G.S.T.L. 305 (S.C.) to contend that the writ petition itself is not maintainable. 6. I have considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. 7. The notice had been issued by the first respondent to the petitioner, which has also been duly responded. Pursuant to the personal hearing that had been granted to the petitioner, the first respondent had considered the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....trenuously relying upon the counter affidavit tried to sustain the DRC-07 notice, I do not find any averment specifically sustaining the said demand. 9. In fact, in the counter affidavit, the second respondent had categorically admitted that the petitioner had reversed the said wrongly availed ITC, however had expressed his inability, as the portal would not permit such reversal. The said reaso....