2017 (9) TMI 2038

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spect that the notice issued by this Court in the petition was not served and ex parte order has been passed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.Indravadan Parmar, learned counsel for the Applicants and Mr.Viral K. Shah, learned counsel for the Respondent. 3. At the outset, it deserves to be noted that, the Applicants have also preferred Civil Application (O.J.) No. 418/2016 for recalling of the order dated 07.04.2016 passed by this Court (Coram : Hon'ble Ms.Justice Abhilasha Kumari) in Company Petition No. 10/2016 on the same grounds, which are raised in this application. The said application has been dismissed by this Court and has observed thus: "7. This Court has scrutinized the record and found that this fact is borne out from....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 09.05.2016 and 11.05.2016, which is after the date of the order of admission dated 07.04.2016. However, insofar as the service of notice through direct service is concerned, the record reveals that the said notice was served to applicants Nos. 2 to 4 on 18.02.2016 at 3.30 p.m. and to the applicant No. 1 on 28.01.2016. This has been written on the back side of the notice which was to be taken from this Court by the petitioner in order to effect direct service. The seal of the Company, Samshi Pipe Industries Limited along with its address, is appended on this page. The notices appear to have been accepted by Gopalbhai Solanki, the watchman. Learned counsel for the respective parties have scrutinized this record which is available ....