AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (5) TMI 1486
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
........of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO. 3054-3055/2018] Civil Appeal NO. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO. 3056-3057/2018] Civil Appeal NO. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO. 3058-3059/2018] Civil Appeal No. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 740/2018] Civil Appeal No. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 2877/2018] Civil Appeal No. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 16349/2018] Civil Appeal No. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 12600/2019] Civil Appeal No. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 2259/2020] Civil Appeal No. ......of 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No........ of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 28682/2021]; M.A. No.45 OF 2023 in C.A. No.8649 OF 2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) NO.3071-3072 OF 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.738 OF 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.2876 OF 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No. 2878 OF 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No.5818 OF 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C).....OF 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 8523 OF 2018], CIVIL....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f SLP (C) No.22860 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22851 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22862 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22863 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22864 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22865 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22853 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22854 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.22855 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.29190 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.29191 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.29192 OF 2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.24781 OF 2019]; MA NO. 1267/2019 IN R.P.(C)NO.411/2017 IN C.A. NO. 8726/2016; MA NO. 2622/2019 IN R.P.(C)NO.405/2017 IN C.A. NO. 8906/2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... OF 2024 Arising out of Diary No. 45820/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SL....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sing out of SLP(C) No. 16015/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...... OF 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 17877 OF 2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ..... ... OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...... OF 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 26605 OF 2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ..... ... OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...... OF 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 28686 OF 2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ..... ... OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...... OF 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 29096 OF 2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 16348/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C)NO.26088/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of; SLP(C)NO. 26089/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C)NO. 26393/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO. 31309/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO.10154/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C)NO.2260/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ......of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 22128 OF 2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ......of 2024] [Arising o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... out of SLP(C) No. 18608/2022] MA No.46/2023 IN RP D No. 20336/2019 IN CA NO. 8649/2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 501/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 15687/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [ Arising out of Diary No. 21004/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 21033/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.21052 of 2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 27935/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 27959/2022]; M.A. D. No.37562/2022 IN RP D NO. 23724/2019 IN CA NO. 8654/2016; M.A. D. No. 40294/2022 IN CA NO.8926/2016; M.A. D. No. 40305/2022 IN CA NO. 11818/2016; M.A. D. No.40310 of 2022 IN RP 1017/2017 IN CA NO. 11818/2016; M.A. No. D. No. 40767/2022 IN RP D.No. 45469/2019 IN CA NO. 8926/2016 M.A. D.No. 40773/2022 IN CA NO.6230/2017; M.A. D.No. 446/....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....] [Arising out of Diary No. 12025/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 12338/2023]; M.A.Diary No. 12639/2023; M.A.Diary No. 12978/2023; M.A. Diary No. 13159/2023, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 13549/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 14584/2023]; M.A. Diary No. 14601/2023, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 14703/2023] M.A. Diary No. 14854/2023, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 15173/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 15177/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 15266/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 8581/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 10729/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 17829/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 22888/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 27992/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 28055/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 28446/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 32409/2022] M.A. Diary No. 11767/2023 IN D No. 27340/2019, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 14692/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 14751/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 14789/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 14797/2023], CIVIL APPE....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....O. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 32408/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 37246/2022]; M.A. Diary No(s). 2556/2023 M.A. Diary No(s). 2941/2023, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 4587/2023] MA No.1642/2023 in C.A. No. 8477/2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 12373/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 12955/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 13544/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 14180/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 17211/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 18682/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....017 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8705 OF 2016, R.P.(C)NO.1637 OF 2017 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11581 OF 2016, R.P.(C)NO.1113 OF 2018 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9899 OF 2016, R.P.(C)NO.2438 OF 2017 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8924 OF 2016, R.P. D. No. 6303 OF 2018 IN CA No 6183/2017, R.P. D. No. 18945/2018 IN CA No 6235/2017,, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 20202 of 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 21275 of 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 29144 of 2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..... of 2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 29714/2018] R.P. D. No. 35922/2018 IN CA 6263/2017, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 30454 of 2018] R.P. D. No. 26490/2019 IN CA 9031/2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 2463 OF 2020] M.A D. No. 37093/2022 IN CA No 8654/2016; M.A D. No 40963/2022 IN D No 5204/2020 M.A D. No. 515/2023 IN CA No 8711/2016; M.A D. No. 527/2023 IN CA No 8617/2016; M.A. NO. 1625/2023 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8584 OF 2016; M.A D. No.4967/2023 IN D NO. 7759/2022; M.A D. No. 12592/2023 IN D NO. 10856/2022 M.A D. No. 12635/2023 IN CA NO.8154/201....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... [Arising out of Diary No(s). 9841/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 10218/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 23770/2022] M.A D. No. 41774/2022 IN CA NO. 8562/2016 M.A D. No. 41777/2022 IN D NO. 22936/2021; M.A D. No. 42064/2022 IN CA NO. 8685/2016; M.A D. No. 42071/2022 IN D NO.1090/2020; M.A D. No.42406/2022 IN D NO. 14203/2019; M.A D. No.42459/2022 IN CA NO. 8651/2016; M.A D. No. 402/2023 IN D NO. 27346/2019; M.A. NO. 1647/2023 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8566/2016; M.A D. No. 3484/2023 IN CA NO. 8530/2016; M.A D. No.4367/2023 IN D NO. 2379/2021; M.A D. No. 11686/2023 IN D NO. 9844/2022; M.A D. No.11706/2023 IN D NO. 38549/2019; M.A D. No. 14289/2023 IN CA NO. 8493/2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28277/2016], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 20203/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 30451/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 29611/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 29825/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 20....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../2019, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 6926/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 13525/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 31393/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 31839/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 1359/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 2441/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 15864/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 21557/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 30445/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 14565/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 24244/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 38890/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 39310/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 41084/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 41445/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 41703/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 42045/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 77/2023]; M.A. NO. 1931/2023 IN SLP(C)NO.6367/2016, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 4841/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 6339/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 12327/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Aris....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g out of Diary No(s). 32916/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 33172/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 33345/2015], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 39526/2017] R.P.(C)NO.1/2018 IN, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2980/2017, CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 7178/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 7195/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 228/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 10266/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 15896/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 21134/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 22116/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 14597/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 15623/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 29310/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 29650/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 37815/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8791/2016], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [ Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8773/2016], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28212/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 29614/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 1382/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 395/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 12155/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 12601/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22131/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....IL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 29803/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 27923/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 27975/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 27989/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 42036/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8758/2016], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 4298/2017], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22691/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 20458/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 26635/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 21381/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 21382/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... 27211/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 10674/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 937/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 947/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 17418/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 17613/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 18136/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 19415/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 29111/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 12519/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 14207/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 28059/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 4601/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. .....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Diary No(s). 7350/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8769/2016], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8765/2016], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22259/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 24080/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22688/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 11164/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22340/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 18/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 21758/2019], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 14776/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 12692/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 14777/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 6519/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 22560/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No(s). 53/2021], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 3172/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 4265/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 5017/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 13554/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 14069/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 15816/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 35480/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 35488/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.7188/2018], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 34804/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. ..../2024] [Arising out of Diary No. 13552/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) N....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....4] [Arising out of Diary No.38633/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.40192/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.21006/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.39771/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.36156/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.38635/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.38874/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.39775/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No...../2024] [Arising out of Diary No.41675/2023], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 815/2020], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 13889/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 13933/2022], CIVIL APPEAL NO. ......OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 13774/2022] M.A. No. Diary No. 5141/2023 I....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Adv., Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR, Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, AOR, Ms. Arti Singh, AOR, Ms. Manika Tripathy, AOR, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Adv., Mr. Rony John, Adv., Ms. Prachi Bajpai, AOR, Ms. Shashi Kiran, AOR, Mr. Satish Chandra, Adv., Mr. Arjun Sain, Adv., Mr. Ravi Bharuka, AOR, Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR, Ms. Payal Swarup, Adv., Mr. Ameet Siingh, Adv., Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv., Mr. Pratham Sethi, Adv., Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv., Ms. Pratishtha Majumdar, Adv., Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR, Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv., Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Puneet Sharma, AOR, Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR, Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv., Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv., Mr. Rahul Kumari, Adv., Mr. Rahul Pandey, Adv., Mr. Avs Kadyan, Adv., Ms. Yoothica Pallavi, AOR, Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, AOR, Mr. Arpit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Himaghn Jain, Adv., Ms. Sonakshi Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR, Ms. Malvika Kapila, AOR, Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv., Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Adv., Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR, Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR, Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR, Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, AOR, Mr. Vinay Mohan Sharma, Adv., Mr. Baljeet Singh, Adv., Ms. Arti Anupriya, Adv., Mr. Kartikey, Adv., Mr. Paras Juneja, Adv., Mr. Vineet Yadav, Adv.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....harma, Adv., Mr. Animesh Mishra, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Batra, AOR, Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Adv., Ms. Shivani Chawla, Adv., Mr. Rhythm Katyal, Adv., Ms. Archna Yadav, Adv., Mr. Pratyush Arora, Adv., Mr. Yuvraj Chhabra, Adv., Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR, Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv., Mr. Kshitiz Singh, Adv., Mr. Dev Sharma, Adv., Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, AOR, Mr. Priyesh Mohan Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv., Ms. Sonal K. Chopra, Adv., Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv., Mr. N S Vasisht, Adv., Ms. Jyoti Kataria, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv., Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Adv., Ms. Shruti Verma, Adv., Ms. Aparajita Jha, Adv., Mr. Aakrisht Kalra, Adv., Mr. Desam Sudhakarareddy, Adv., Mr. Varun Kapur, AOR, Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Bharat Arora, Adv., Mr. Gourav Arora, Adv., Mr. Manikya Khanna, Adv., Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Adv., Mr. Sharath Sampath, Adv., Mr. Tarun Mehta, Adv., Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv., Mr. Anand Chichra, Adv., Mr. Raghav Bhatia, Adv., Mr. Vikrant Kumar, Adv., M/S. Vedya Partners, AOR, Mr. Sumit Bansal, Adv., Mr. Manish Paliwal, AOR, Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Adv., Ms. Megha Yadav, Adv., Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR, M....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Kumar, Adv., Mr. Debesh Panda, AOR, Ms. Sugandha Anand, AOR, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR, Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR, Mr. Anand Varma, AOR, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Adv., Mr. Vikas Gupta, AOR, Mr. Vivek Gupta, Adv., Dr. Vipin Gupta, Adv., Mr. M. C. Dhingra, AOR, Mr. Sanchar Anand, Adv., Ms. Diva Singh, Adv., Mr. Aman Kumar Thakur, Adv., Mr. Arjun Rana, Adv., Mr. Karan Thakur, Adv., Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR, Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv., Mr. Priyesh Mohan Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv., Ms. Sonal K. Chopra, Adv., M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR, Mr. Ajit Sharma, AOR, Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR, Mr. R.B. Singh, Adv., Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, AOR, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Uday Gupta, Sr. Adv., Ms. Shivani Lal, Adv., Mr. Chetan Anand, Adv., Ms. Sanam Singh, Adv., Mr. Harish Dasan, Adv., Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Adv., Ms. Yogamaya M.g., Adv., Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv., Ms. Anjitha Santosh, Adv., Mr. Hiren Dasan, AOR, Mr. Tushar Bakshi, AOR, Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR, Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, AOR, Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR, Ms. Shrika Gautam, Adv., Mr. Pankaj Bhagat, AOR, Mr. Sadre Alam, Adv., Mr. Ritwik Prasad, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR, Mr. Gurdeep Singh, Adv., Mr. Sajj....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Prasad, Adv., Mr. Shaiendra Kumar Nirmal, Adv., Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Adv., Mr. Shailendra Kumar Nirmal, Adv., Mr. Anant Kumar, Adv., Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv., Mr. Mohd. Hasibuddin, Adv., Mr. Anurag Jain, Adv., Mr. Ms. Soni, Adv., Mr. Charudatta Vijayrao Mahindrakar, AOR, Mr. Gaurav M. Liberhan, Adv., Mr. Arun Singh Rawat, Adv., Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, AOR, Mr. Alok Sangwan, Adv., Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv., Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv., Mr. Vaibhav Yadav, Adv., Ms. Snehla Chaudhary, Adv., Mr. Anas Choudhary, Adv., Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR, Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AOR, Mr. Shrimay Mishra, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Pandey, Adv., Mr. Rakesh Chander, Adv., Ms. Shipra Ghose, AOR, Mr. Y K Kapur, Adv., Mr. Amrendra Kumar Mehta, AOR, Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, AOR, Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Varun Singh, Adv., Ms. Kajal Gupta, Adv., Mr. Aman Panwar, Adv., Ms. Kajal S Gupta, Adv., Ms. Somesa S Gupta, Adv., Mr. Mudit Gupta, AOR, Ms. Somesa Gupta, Adv., Mr. Akash Panwar, Adv., Ms. Priyanjali Singh, AOR, Mr. Sudhir Naagar, AOR, Mr. U.K. Uniyal, Sr. Adv., Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv., Mr. Dhananjay Garg, AOR, Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv., Mr. Ishaan Tiwari, Adv., Mr. R.P. Bansal, Adv., Mr. V Lakshmikumaran, Adv., Ms. Charany....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Gupta, AOR, Mr. Prithvi Pal, AOR, Mr. S. K. Rout, Adv., Mr. Ganesh Singh, Adv., Mr. Amit Acharya, Adv., Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Adv., Mr. Priyonkoo Anjan Gogoi, Adv., Mr. Pryonkoo Anjan Gogoi, Adv., Ms. Priti, Adv., Ms. Shashi Kiran, AOR, Mr. Satish Chandra, Adv., Mr. Arjun Sain, Adv., Mr. Abhimanyu, Adv., Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR, Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR, Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR, Ms. Rashi Rampal, Adv., Ms. Priyambada Mishra, Adv., Mr. Adith Nair, Adv., Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, AOR, Ms. Preeti Kumari, Adv., Mr. Anurag Bansal, Adv., Ms. Asha Jain Madan, AOR, Mr. Mukesh Jain, Adv., Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR, Ms. Astha Tyagi, AOR, Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, AOR, Ms. Firdouse Qutb Wani, AOR, Mr. Md. Zaryab J Rizvi, Adv., Mr. B.V. Niren, Adv., Mr. Kshitij Mudgal, Adv., Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, AOR, Ms. Anshul Rajora, Adv., Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, AOR, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, AOR, Mr. Ritesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR, Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv., Mr. C.P. Rajwar, Adv., Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv., Mr. Lav Kumar Agarwal, Adv., Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR, Ms. Malvika Kapila, AOR, Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv., Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Adv., Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv., Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv., Ms. Deepali, Adv., Mr. Amit ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs. Meenakshi Jain, Adv., Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, AOR, Mr. Alok Tripathi, AOR, Mr. Rahul Shyam Bhandari, AOR, Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, AOR, Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR, JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J. Table of contents A. Facts 64 B. Contentions of parties 72 C. Law on Condonation of Delay 78 D. Whether delay should be condoned in the present cases? 82 D.1. Suppression of facts by the landowners 82 D.2. Change of law 85 D.3. Leeway to be granted to government entities 91 D.4. COVID-19 Pandemic 94 D.5. Supreme Court frowning upon the filing of fresh SLPs 97 D.6. Public interest and justice 98 D.7. Delay already condoned in some cases 102 E. Conclusion and Directions 104 Appendix 114 List A: S uppression of facts 116 List B: Notice neither on delay nor on merits 120 List C: Review Petitions and Miscellaneous Applications 129 List D: Leave granted in previous SLP 131 List E: Leave not granted in previous SLP 134 For the reasons assigned in Part E of this Judgement, we grant leave in all these Special Leave Petitions, except those mentioned in 'Li....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the 2013 Act provided that land acquisition proceedings initiated under the earlier regime would be deemed to have lapsed in certain cases, including when compensation had not been paid or possession had not been taken. The provision reads as follows: "(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, in any case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894),- (a) where no award under Section 11 of the said Land Acquisition Act has been made, then, all provisions of this Act relating to the determination of compensation shall apply; or (b) where an award under said Section 11 has been made, then such proceedings shall continue under the provisions of the said Land Acquisition Act, as if the said Act has not been repealed. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), in case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where an award under the said Section 11 has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of this Act but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceedings shall b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... However, a two-judge bench of this Court in Yogesh Neema v. State of Madhya Pradesh [(2016) 6 SCC 387, para 6-7] doubted the correctness of Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra). Relying upon the maxim "actus curiae neminem gravabit" (i.e., the act of court should not prejudice the parties), the bench referred for reconsideration the question of law regarding the effect of an order of stay on possession under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act to a larger bench. 3.8. Similarly, another two-judge bench of this Court in Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [(2018) 1 SCC 733, para 23.] doubted the correctness of Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and referred the question of law regarding the manner of payment under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act for reconsideration. 3.9. Both these issues were considered by a three-judge bench of this Court in Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [(2018) 3 SCC 412, para 216-217.] The larger bench held, inter alia, that the term "paid" in Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act is to be read as "tender" of payment, i.e., an offer to pay. In case the compensation was tendered and the same was refused, it was to be interpreted as "paid". ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... deemed to have lapsed if compensation was tendered to the landowner and later deposited in the Treasury. With respect to possession, the Constitution Bench held that the period of stay granted in favour of landowners ought to be excluded. Consequently, Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra) were overruled. This Court also overruled Shailendra (supra), since the question of reading the conditions under Section 24(2) conjunctively (i.e., reading "or" as 'and') was not considered by that case. Subsequently, in light of the decision in Manoharlal (supra), the judgment in Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) was recalled. 3.13. After the dust stood settled finally in Manoharlal (supra), the appellants filed another batch of appeals against such orders of the High Court of Delhi which had relied on Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra) to declare the acquisition proceedings as having lapsed. Similarly, Review Petitions and Miscellaneous Applications were filed against the orders of this Court dismissing the SLPs filed previously. 3.14. To simplify, the present batch of matters before....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....his Court held that fraud vitiates the delay that occurred before its discovery. The discovery of the facts suppressed by the respondents before the High Court, gives rise to a fresh cause of action and, hence the period preceding the revelation of such fraud deserves to be excluded while calculating the limitation period. (b) The appellants were disabled from filing appeals within the prescribed limitation period because the governing law during such period as laid down in Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra), would have caused the dismissal of their petitions. Since the question of law was finally decided in their favour in Shailendra (supra) and Manoharlal (supra), their cause of action stood revived to enable them to approach this Court. Further, a case is applied retrospectively unless the judgment expressly recites otherwise, as held in CIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. [(2008) 14 SCC 171, para 35.] Since Manoharlal (supra) did not restrict its applicability prospectively, all the cases decided before thereto deserve to be re-decided based on the principles enunciated in it. (c) The Court should t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... whenever a question of law were to be interpreted differently. Further, Shailendra (supra) and Manoharlal (supra) could not be applied retrospectively, since overruling of cases relying on Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra) took away only their precedential effect and did not re-open the lis between the parties in those cases. The respondents have in this regard relied upon various decisions of this Court including Neelima Srivastava v. State of UP [2021 SCC Online SC 610, para 29.] and Natural Resources Allocation, In re, Special Reference 1 of 2012. [(2012) 10 SCC 1, para 48.] (c) There should be parity between private parties and government entities with respect to the yardstick to be applied for condonation of delay and no leeway should be granted to the latter (relied on, inter alia, Postmaster General v. Living Media India Ltd) [(2012) 3 SCC 563, para 28.]. (d) This Court has made it clear in Sagufa Ahmed v. Upper Assam Plywood Products (P) Ltd., [(2021) 2 SCC 317, para 17.] that the relaxation on account of COVID-19 can be granted only in those cases where the limitation period expired during COVID-19. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ought not to be hanging over an individual for an indeterminate period; (ii) those who have been lethargic in safeguarding their interests should not expect the law to come to their rescue; and (iii) a defendant ought not to suffer for lost evidence owing to the passage of time. 9. Section 3 of the Limitation Act reflects this philosophy. Every suit or appeal made after the period of limitation ought to be dismissed, notwithstanding whether such ground had been raised by the opposite side. However, this does not imply that the Limitation Act destroys the right itself. Instead, it only extinguishes the ability to enforce the right, without either creating or destroying the underlying cause of action or entitlement itself. 10. As is clear from a plain reading of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, there are exceptions to this general rule. The statute allows for admitting an action provided "sufficient cause" is shown. This vests courts with the discretion to extend the period of limitation if the applicant can show that he had sufficient cause for not preferring an appeal or application within the prescribed period. Section 5 requires analysis of two ingredients: first, an examin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....suffice for condonation given this second prong of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. However, the applicant shall not be required to prove each day's delay till the date of filing such appeal/application. [Ummer v. Pottengal Subida, (2018) 15 SCC 127, para 14.] 15. With these broad yardsticks in mind, we shall now separately analyze each ground pleaded by the appellants on the anvil of sufficiency. D. WHETHER DELAY SHOULD BE CONDONED IN THE PRESENT CASES? D.1. Suppression of facts by the landowners 16. The appellants argued that the respondent-landowners had suppressed material facts from the High Court, including previous unsuccessful litigations. Acquisitions were in fact already complete in many of these cases, a fact that was deliberately not disclosed. Other respondent-landowners also concealed from the court how they were only subsequent purchasers who had acquired the lands after they had been notified for the acquisition. Similarly, in some cases, the landowners suppressed the fact that the acquired lands had already vested in their respective Gaon Sabhas. 17. In addition to highlighting the factum of suppression, the appellants have also demonstrated material....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion, and that too without giving adequate opportunities to the parties can be a potential threat to the cause of justice. Simultaneously, we are satisfied that the appellants' contention in this regard cannot be brushed aside lightly. 21. Without expressing any final definitive opinion on such allegations of concealment, we are of the considered view that the appellants have discharged a prima facie burden for the limited purpose of making out a case for condonation of delay in the cases mentioned in the appended 'List-A', which shall be read as a part of this judgment. We believe that a fact-finding exercise is necessary in these cases, and hence, there exist sufficient grounds for the condonation of delay. The nature of relief to be eventually granted after condoning the delay, will be separately dealt with in Part E of this order. D.2. Change of law 22. Another ground taken by appellants for seeking condonation of delay is the subsequent change of law brought in by Shailendra (supra) and Manoharlal (supra). However, we are unable to agree with this contention because of four primary reasons. 23. Firstly, this ground seeks to use events temporally subsequent to the e....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er limitation had expired - that the case was fit for appeal by the State Government. Now, it is true that a party is entitled to wait until the last day of limitation for filing an appeal. But when it allows limitation to expire and pleads sufficient cause for not filing the appeal earlier, the sufficient cause must establish that because of some event or circumstance arising before limitation expired it was not possible to file the appeal within time. No event or circumstance arising after the expiry of limitation can constitute such sufficient cause. There may be events or circumstances subsequent to the expiry of limitation which may further delay the filing of the appeal. But that the limitation has been allowed to expire without the appeal being filed must be traced to a cause arising within the period of limitation. In the present case, there was no such cause, and the High Court erred in condoning the delay." [emphasis supplied] 25. Similarly, in most of these cases, the prescribed period of limitation had already expired long before the judgments in Shailendra (supra) and Manoharlal (supra) were delivered. The appellants let the limitation period lapse, perhaps becau....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... SCC 110, para 12.] in which a 5-Judge Bench of this Court had the occasion to consider the question of condonation of delay on the basis of subsequent change of law. While giving the majority opinion, Hidayatullah, CJ. held: "[...] Everybody is presumed to know the law. It was his duty to have brought the matter before this Court for consideration. In any event, having set the machinery of law in motion he cannot abandon it to resume it after a number of years, because another person more adventurous than he in his turn got the statute declared unconstitutional, and got a favourable decision. If I were to hold otherwise, then the decision of the High Court in any case once adjudicated upon and acquiesced in, may be questioned in a fresh litigation revived only with the argument that the correct position was not known to the petitioner at the time when he abandoned his own litigation. [...]" [emphasis supplied] 29. Finally, the fourth reason why subsequent overruling of a judgement cannot be a sufficient cause is because when a case is overruled, it is only its binding nature as a precedent that is taken away and the lis between the parties is still deemed to have be....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-opened and re-decided solely on the basis of a new interpretation given to that law. D.3. Leeway to be granted to government entities 33. The appellants have vehemently contended that the government entities ought to be allowed leeway for condonation of delay. For this, the appellants placed reliance on Collector (LA) (supra) and G. Ramegowda (supra) which held that courts ought to be generous while considering delay on the part of government entities given factors unique to them like the impersonal nature of their functioning, inherited bureaucratic methodology, and procedural red-tapeism. 34. However, with time, the position of law held in these cases has been diluted. In Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Amateur Riders Club, [(1994) Supp. (2) SCC 603, para 3.] this Court noted that while latitude can be granted to the government, it has to show its bona fide and diligence in filing the appeals. In case of bureaucratic indifference, delay cannot be condoned. 35. Subsequently, in the case of Postmaster General (supra), this Court noted that the delay cannot be condoned mechanically only because the appellant is a government entity. The Court explicitly negated the earlier....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... would be the only question whereas in the latter, whether there has been proper exercise of discretion in favour of grant of the prayer for condonation would be the question..." [emphasis supplied] 39. It seems to us that acceding to the appellants' request on the aforesaid account would also have undesirable consequences. If delay were to be condoned merely on the basis of a broad general assertion of bureaucratic indifference, without requiring demonstration of bona fide or an act of mala fide on the part of specific individuals, it would create an artificial distinction between the private parties and the government entities vis-à-vis the law of limitation. This would not be in conformity with the spirit of equality before law as guaranteed under our Constitution. Allowing such latitude would further distort incentives for the government and encourage more laxity by the bureaucracy in its general functioning, thereby undermining quality governance. D.4. COVID-19 Pandemic 40. The fourth ground taken by the appellants is that the delay ought to be condoned on account of the COVID-19 pandemic. At this juncture, it would be apposite to discuss the series of order....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dified on 10.01.2022, with a total period of approximately 716 days between 15.03.2020-28.02.2022 being excluded from the operation of limitation. [(2022) 3 SCC 117, para 5.] 44. The respondents submit that the orders of this Court passed by this Court from time to time as referred to above, would not come to the aid of the appellants since these orders saved only those actions and proceedings which were within the period of limitation as on 15.03.2020. They contended that the aforementioned orders ought not to be construed in a manner to resuscitate actions and proceedings that were time-barred before the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. If the limitation period had already expired before the pandemic, such cases could not take shelter behind the general relief granted by this Court in In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (supra). The respondents buttressed their arguments by relying upon Sagufa Ahmed v. Upper Assam Plywood Products (P) Ltd. [(2021) 2 SCC 317, para 17.] 45. Sagufa Ahmed (supra) construed that the orders passed In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (supra) were intended to benefit vigilant litigants who were prevented due to the pandemic and the l....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... would reveal that there are many other interests at stake and it might not be possible to undo the acquisitions without causing significant cascading harms and losses to public infrastructure. 51. Most of the acquisitions here have reached finalization as possession had been taken over or compensation stood paid. Additionally, development projects have also begun on many of such lands. In numerous cases, the land has been deployed for essential public projects such as hospitals, schools, expansion of the metro, etc. Hence, the effect of non-condonation of delay would go beyond mere financial loss to the exchequer, and instead extend to the public at large. 52. Moreover, there would also be a significant unscrambling the egg problem, where compensation paid would have to be clawed back or possession taken would have to be reversed. Problematically, in many cases, the development projects might also have to be undone. In some instances-such as reversing the possession of one small plot lying on an under-construction metro corridor-it would be practically impossible. 53. As discussed in paragraphs 11 to 13 of this judgement, in addition to the bona fides of the condonation-s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....law. As discussed earlier in paragraph 13, the law of limitation is intended to curb the evil of deliberate or negligent laxity in legal proceedings, which is not the case here. Hence, the larger interest of justice mandates us to condone the delay in the present batch of cases. The consequential relief, after condonation of delay, is however dealt with in Part E (infra) below. 57. This approach is also seconded by the case of State of Jharkhand v. Lalu Prasad Yadav, [(2017) 8 SCC 1, para 67-69.] in which this Court noted that while the Central Bureau of Investigation failed to follow its own manual and filed SLPs with delay, such delay should be condoned in light of the facts of the case and to advance the cause of justice. 58. We note that the respondents have cited Pundlik Jalam Patil (supra) to argue that public interest cannot be a sole ground to seek condonation of delay. A closer examination of the aforementioned case, however, would show that the Court in that case denied condonation of delay as the government had been found to be negligent and given that it had been established that the landowners depended on the acquired lands for their livelihood. As discussed abov....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s put forth by the government authorities for condonation of delay, like subsequent change of law, special leeway for government entities, or the Court allegedly frowning upon filing of fresh SLPs; cannot be accepted, however, the appellants have made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay on the ground of public interest. In addition, the cases where allegations of suppression of material facts have been made also cannot be rejected at the threshold. Similarly, if a case falls within the parameters laid down in In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (supra), namely, that the delay occurred on account of the COVID-19 pandemic, such delay can also be condoned. Consequently, the delay is condoned in all these matters, except those mentioned in 'List-B', 'List-C.2', 'List-D.2' and 'List-E.1' (infra). 65. Having condoned the delay and upon grant of leave and after perusing the material on record, we find that the cases which form part of the appended 'List-E.2' are squarely covered in favor of the appellants in terms of Manoharlal (supra). While it may not be feasible to give detailed analysis of each of these cases, suffice it would be to show the same illustratively.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... direct that let notice be issued in these petitions on merits, returnable on 22.07.2024. 70. At this stage, we may hasten to add that the cases mentioned in the appended 'List-A' contain allegations of fraud against the landowners. As discussed in paragraph 21, given that a detailed factfinding inquiry is necessary to ascertain the rightful title-holder and the claimant of receiving the compensation, we hereby set aside the orders of the High Court that are under challenge in these civil appeals or in the civil appeals out of which the subject Review Petitions or Miscellaneous Applications have arisen. We revive the relevant writ petitions, which shall stand restored on the file of the High Court. After deciding the question of suppression of facts, the High Court shall proceed to dispose of the cases on merits, in terms of our dictum in these batch of cases. 71. In this regard, the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi is requested to constitute a dedicated bench to decide these writ petitions in the manner indicated hereafter. The nominated bench will accord an opportunity to the landowners/subsequent purchasers and the appellants herein to submit additional doc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uences, also as per law, shall follow; (b) The parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession, change of land use, and creation of third-party rights till fresh acquisition proceedings, as directed above, are completed; (c) Since the respondent land-owners are not primarily dependent upon the subject lands as their source of sustenance and most of these lands were/are under use for other than agricultural purposes, we deem it appropriate to invoke our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution and dispense with the compliance of Chapters II and III of the 2013 Act, whereunder it is essential to prepare a Social Impact Assessment Study Report and / or to develop alternative multi-crop irrigated agricultural land. We do so to ensure that the timeline of one year extended at (a) above to complete the acquisition process can be adhered to by the appellants and the GNCTD, which would also likely be beneficial for the expropriated land owners; (d) Similarly, compliance with Sections 13, 14, and 16 to 20 of 2013 Act can be dispensed with as the subject-lands are predominantly urban/semi-urban in nature and had earlier been acquired for public ....