Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 1362

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Appellant: Shri Jatin Mahajan, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri Rakesh Agarwal, Authorised Representative ORDER P V SUBBA RAO M/s. Dinesh Irrigation Pvt. Ltd. Jaipur Appellant filed this appeal to assail the Order-in-Original dated 30.11.2017 Impugned order passed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jaipur. 2. A Show Cause Notice SCN dated 30.5.2012 was issued to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....20,085 was demanded in the impugned order, being 10% of the value of the exempted goods cleared by the appellant under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 CCR on the ground that the appellant had failed to maintain separate records of the inputs and input services used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted products. 5. According to the appellant, it had, indeed maintained such reco....