Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (10) TMI 811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the course of audit of records of the appellants, it was found that apart from the price of the Excisable Goods, the Appellants had collected some charges from their customers (buyers) such as Technical charges, Design and Engineering Charges, Knowhow & Engineering charges for Technical Advice/Assistance for planning, development of Engineering designs, installation and erection (at site) charges etc. The Audit team, after duly deducting the Installation and erection and Commissioning charges (which are post manufacturing charges for the present Appellant), worked out the said other charges collected by the Appellant from the buyers which should be included in the Assessable value and according....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id order-in-original dated 20.01.2017, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who has rejected the appeal therefore, the present appeal filed by the appellant. 2. Shri M Neerav Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant at the outset submits that the Hon'ble Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority with directions to consider the matter on merit, in view of various Courts decisions and also directed to give personal hearing in remand proceeding the adjudicating authority again failed to appreciate decisions of the Hon'ble court and Tribunal wherein distinction in pre-manufacturing expenses (designing, site visit, etc.), post manufacturing expenses (erraction, installation and other servic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t in respect of those invoices no inclusion can be made in the assessable value of the goods manufactured and cleared on payment of duty. Similarly, there are certain invoices which relates to post-manufacturing and clearance of the goods i.e. related to overall assembly and installation of the plant at site which is not connected with the manufacturing of the appellant. Therefore, the same is also not includable in the assessable value. However, the adjudicating authority has not verified these vital facts before passing a de-novo order. Needless to say that on the post manufacturing and removal expenses, there are various judgments, wherein it was held that the value of the same will not be included in the assessable value in the manufact....