2021 (12) TMI 1506
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For the Petitioner : Ms. Archana with Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma. For Respondent : None. JUDGMENT/ORDER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI 1. Petitioner has preferred this Civil Writ Petition aggrieved by the order dated 09.11.2018 passed by the learned Adjudicating Authority to the extent of the Hotel Palak Paradise. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the PML....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ents and in the meantime, status quo relating to the property was directed to be maintained where the entire premises was seized and petitioner who was a resident was not being permitted to use his premises. 4. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on "Seema Garg Vs. Dy. DIR., Directorate of Enforcement (PMLA), Jalandhar" 2020(374) E.L.T. 46(P & H) in the High Court of Punjab and Harya....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as of today" 12:00 O'clock. This order was passed on 21.12.2018. Prior to this date vide Annexure-4 and Annexure-5 dated 28.11.2018 and 14.12.2018, petitioner was informed that in compliance of provisions contained in Sub-section 4 of Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, constructive possession of the premises has been taken over by the Enforcement Directorate. This fact was not b....


TaxTMI