2024 (10) TMI 366

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Petitioner : Ms. Jinita Chatterjee i/b. Mr. Himanshu Patil. For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Saxena. P.C. 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board on a praecipe as moved on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner, which claims to be a non-profitable institution and running a Home for aged persons, is before the Court challenging an order dated 16 October, 2023 passed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n fact dispatched from the office of respondent no. 1 on 22 August, 2023. By such notice, the petitioner was called upon to attend a hearing which was fixed on 21 August, 2023 at 5.30 p.m. The said notice was received by the petitioner on 25 August, 2023 which was after the scheduled date of hearing. 4. The claim of the department is that such notice was sent to the petitioner by email on 8 Aug....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not only the portal but the record also indicated the correct email address of the petitioner as contained in the form being a copy of the portal registration (at Exhibit R-2) annexed to the rejoinder affidavit dated 5 August, 2024 of Rosy Lopes filed on behalf of the petitioner. 6. It appears that an erroneous communication of the notice has resulted into the impugned order dated 16 October, ....