Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (5) TMI 1071

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h Mittal, B. Naveen Kumar and G.N. Ghosh ORDER 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakh only) imposed under Section 17(4) of FEMA, 1999 by the Special Director (Appeals), Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai vide Adjudication Order No. SD(A)/FEMA-4/2010-ll dated 16.11.2010 and there is an application for dispensation of the demand in questio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellant's inability to get the documentation in time and demise of her husband. The proceedings are being defended by the widow of the appellant, who has been impleaded as legal heir of her husband after following the due process of law. Delay is condoned. 4. Ld. Counsel apropos application for dispensation contends that appellant's wife is not in a position to this meet financial deman....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat he could obtain the copy of penalty order only in March, 2010. The legal heir further pleased that she did not have enough funds to pay even the appeal filing fee which further caused delay in filing of appeal. 5. The Ld. Counsel pleaded that the Special Director did not properly appreciate the reasons explained for the cause of delay. The fact that the appellant sold his office has not been ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppeal the reasons for dismissing the first appeal in limine on the limitation without appreciating that when the technical consideration and substantial justice are pitted against each other the cause of substantial justice is to prevail as held in Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment in the case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji [1987] 167 ITR 471. 8. In consideration of the above facts....