2024 (9) TMI 1583

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Petitioner/s : Mr. Anubhav Khowala, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order passed at Annexure P/8 dated 18.04.2024 and the ground raised is of violation of the provision under Section 129 (3) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for brevity 'the Act'). 2. The contention....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....c holiday and hence the petitioner filed a reply on 12.04.2024. The order was passed on 18.04.2024 while it had to be passed at least on 12.04.2024 since the 11th was a public holiday. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would rely on a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C No. 7985 of 2024 (Pawan Carrying Corporation vs Commissioner CGST & Central Excise & Ors). It is sub....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Section 129 of the Act. 6. In M/s Sangam Wires (supra), according to us is not at all applicable since that was a case in which, on the date of issuance of notice, the order was also passed, where we found that there is clear violation of principles of natural justice. 7. In Pawan Carrying Corporation (supra), though a notice was issued within the time provided in Section 129 (3), the order ....