Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2024 (9) TMI 1583

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ARTHY Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anubhav Khowala, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order passed at Annexure P/8 dated 18.04.2024 and the ground raised is of violation of the provision under Section 129 (3) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....024 to file a reply. The 11th was a public holiday and hence the petitioner filed a reply on 12.04.2024. The order was passed on 18.04.2024 while it had to be passed at least on 12.04.2024 since the 11th was a public holiday. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would rely on a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C No. 7985 of 2024 (Pawan Carrying Corporation vs Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2024, which makes applicable sub-section (5) of Section 129 of the Act. 6. In M/s Sangam Wires (supra), according to us is not at all applicable since that was a case in which, on the date of issuance of notice, the order was also passed, where we found that there is clear violation of principles of natural justice. 7. In Pawan Carrying Corporation (supra), though a notice was issued within....

PrevPreviousNextNext