Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (5) TMI 1379

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, Gautham Krishna E.J., Avinash Kurungot, Shallet K. Sam. For the Respondent : By Advs. I. Sheela Devi, Smt. Chithra P. George, Sc, Food Safety And Standards Authority Of India JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P16 order passed by the 1st respondent under Section 128A of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The petitioner's case is that they are a leading manufacturer and export....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appearing for the petitioner, Smt.Sheeladevi, the learned Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and Smt. Chithra P. George, the learned Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent. 4. Sri. Aswin Gopakumar, placed heavy reliance on the decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court in Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd. vs. State of Bihar and Ors. [(2021) 6 SCR 1094], Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. vs. The Excise and Tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pra). Hence, the writ petition is maintainable. 5. Smt. Sheeladevi, on the other contrary, argued that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.30127/2022, which was dismissed as withdrawn. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a review petition, which was allowed by this Court by Ext. P15 order, permitting the petitioner to exercise its statutory remedy. After Ext.P15 order....