Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (5) TMI 1469

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st the respective orders passed by the CIT(A) for captioned assessment years as tabulated below: Sr. No. ITA/CO Nos. Appeal /Cross Objection by A.Y. Pr.CIT Order dated Assessment Order dated Remarks 1. ITA No.375/Del/2022 Revenue 2012-13 CIT(A)-29, New Delhi order dated 09.12.2021 Assessment order dated 26.12.2018 Assessment Order under section 153C/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.   2 ITA No.376/Del/2022 Revenue 2013-14 CIT(A)-29, New Delhi order dated 09.12.2021 Assessment order dated 26.12.2018 Assessment Order under section 153C/144of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3.  ITA No.377/Del/2022  Revenue  2014-15  CIT(A)-29, New Delhi order dated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Assessment order dated 26.12.2018 Assessment Order under section 153C/144of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee in support of Cross Objection filed by the assessee submitted that the name of the company got struck off from the Register of Members maintained by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (MCA) w.e.f. 19.01.2017. The company master data and company information showing 'strike off' against the company status on the record of MCA was placed on record. 2.1 With reference to such document, the ld. counsel submitted that in pursuance of Section 560(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, the name of the assessee, Zeus Impex Pvt. Ltd., has been struck off ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is not justified. The income in the hands of the assessee can at best be charged on certain small per centage in the region of 0.25% towards commission. The ld. counsel thus submitted that no interference with the order of the CIT(A) on merits is called for. 3. The ld. CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, submitted that the AO was never informed at any stage towards the fact of winding up/strike off. The assessee-company initiated voluntary winding up process and obtained voluntary strike off from the master data to escape the clutches of revenue and forthcoming income tax proceedings owing to search carried out under Section 132 of the Act in the case of Anand Kumar Jain and Naresh Kumar Jain (Jain Brothers) where the large scale....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee-company has been used as a conduit to provide large scale accommodation entries and availed the voluntary strike off from the record of the Master Data of MCA and has thus ceased to exist. The proceedings can be initiated against the assessee-company only when recourse to the revival of the company is taken by the Revenue in accordance with law, substantially affected by such action of the assessee. Paradoxically, the appeal before the Tribunal arises from the first appellate order passed under Section 250 of the Act which, in turn, is based upon incompetent appeal memo signed by a 'former' Director. It is not shown as to how such former director has derived authority in law to pursue appeal before CIT(A) on behalf of a 'struck off' comp....