2024 (9) TMI 384
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....: Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) For the Respondent : Mr. Jagabandhu Sahoo, Sr. Advocate, Mrs. Kajal Sahoo, Advocate JUDGMENT ARINDAM SINHA, J. 1. Revenue seeks to prefer appeal under section 35G in Central Excise Act, 1944. Mr. Satapathy, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue and submits, substantial questions of law arise fro....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ition of 'factory' in section 2 (e) of the Act is read with rules 2(k)(iii) and rule 3 in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. He submits, the appeal be admitted on substantial questions of law suggested in the memorandum or to be framed by us. 4. Mr. Sahoo, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of respondent and seeks service and audience. Mr. Satapathy opposes on submission, the appeal is on thresh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eaning of 'factory' given in the Act. Input includes all goods used for generation of, inter alia, electricity for captive use. Apart from surplus electricity sold to Gridco, electricity that was surplus in the generating unit was transmitted to the other unit for use in manufacture of the dutiable goods. Hence, it cannot be said that the transmitted electricity was not captively used. 7. The T....
TaxTMI