2017 (10) TMI 1658
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Partners for the Petitioner Mr.M.Dwivedi i/b Ms Shalaka Gujar for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Agasti Vibhute for respondent No.5 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and the learned counsel for the respondent No.5. Considering the narrow controversy involved in these two petitions, the same are for....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt no.4 is neither a consignee nor a consignor, the no objection certificate of the respondent No.4 is not required. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 has placed on record a circular dated 11th April 2017 and in particular Item No.18 of the Annexure to the Circular which deals with the change of name of the importer/consignee in the IGM. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s Officer cannot go into this arena as these issues can be resolved only by a Civil Court. Therefore, a direction was issued to the Authority to consider the application for amendment subject to certain conditions. 4 In our view, the present petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the Judgment and Order dated 20th December 2016. 5 Accordingly, we pass the following order: ....
TaxTMI