TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (8) TMI 1054
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s in obtaining the patents undertaken by the foreign companies. The appellant utilised the services related to patent applications which are as follows: (i) securing copies of pertinent reference found in search; (ii) study and analysis of pertinent references; (iii) providing written report covering the following matters; (a) Field of Search, (b) Pertinent Prior Art, (c) Legal Requirements for patentability, (d) discussion of references found its search and e) firm's recommendation; (iv) compiling all disclosure documents necessary to evaluate the invention; (v) analyzing the disclosure materials in light of the relevant disclosures of the prior art, (vi) drafting the field of invention, background of the invention (with Prior Art Discussion), general summary discussion of the invention, brief description of the drawings and abstract section of the patent application; (vii) compiling all disclosure documents necessary to evaluate the invention; (viii) analyzing the disclosure materials in Tight of the relevant disclosures; (ix) analyzing the di....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ce Act, 1994 the appellant is liable for payment of service tax. The Commissioner invoked the extended period for demanding the service tax and also imposed penalties under Section 76, 77 and 78 after confirming the demand of service tax along with interest. Aggrieved by the above order the appellant is in appeal before us. 4. The Learned Counsel submits that the impugned Order has confirmed Service Tax based on the finding that the Appellant had made payment of 'patent charges' and 'professional charges' to various professional law firms for availment of consultancy regarding filing of patent application. It is submitted that the patent fees and professional charges paid to various professional law firms are for availment of consultancy with regard to filing of patent application. The professional law firms provide the following services to Biocon for obtaining the patents: • Compiling all disclosure documents necessary to evaluate the invention; • Analyzing the disclosure materials in light of the relevant disclosures; • Analyzing the differences between the invention and the prior art in light of the patent laws; • Drafting ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n India, are liable to pay tax on 'Business Support' service received in terms of Section 66A read with Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 also read with Rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The professional law firms are experts in the field of patent law and the services rendered by them to the Appellant gets covered under the ambit of Legal consultancy services which was brought under the taxable net only with effect from September 1, 2009 and hence no service tax would be applicable for the period May 2006 to August 2009. Further, the Appellant have already discharged service tax on such services post September 1, 2009. 4.2 The learned counsel further submits that the legal consultancy services received by the Appellant from various foreign companies for filing of patent application would not be liable to service tax under "Business Support Services" as these services are not merely for administrative management as held by the Commissioner in the impugned order, but for rendering consultancy in the field of law. It is also stated that the scope of administrative and operative management was included in the ambit of Business Support Services only with ef....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ellant wishes to submit that service tax will not be applicable on fees paid to the statutory authorities as pure agents and reimbursement of actual expenses incurred by the lawyers. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the supreme court in the case of Union of India and Anr. v. Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd.2018 (10) G.S.T.L. 401 (S.C.). 4.7 The Learned Counsel submits that it was under the bonafide belief that there was no service tax liability in the instant transaction and even if the service tax was paid, the same would be available as CENVAT credit and hence the entire demand would be revenue neutral. Further, there was no intention on part of the Appellant to evade payment of taxes. 4.8 The Appellant submits that the Learned Authority ought not to have confirmed the levy of service tax having regard to the law of limitation. In the absence of any wilful misstatement/ suppression, fraud or collusion on the part of the Appellant, invocation of extended period of limitation and confirmation of levy of tax on the basis thereof is incorrect and hence, the disputed demand is barred by limitation. The Adjudicating Authorities also....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Finance Act, 1994; and (iii) invocation of extended period of demand and penalties for contraventions of various Sections of Finance Act, 1994. 7. The first issue is classification and taxability of services related to patent application provided by various foreign companies all located outside India. As seen from para (2) above, there is no dispute that the services are all related to patent applications and for this service, the appellant has paid 'patent fees' and 'professional charges' for receiving the services from the foreign companies. The Commissioner has confirmed the demands under 'Business Support Services' as defined in Section 65(104C) read with Clause (zzzq) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994. The definition of 'Business Support Service' with effect from 1.5.2006 as per Section 65(104c) reads as: "support services of business or commerce" means services provided in relation to business or commerce and includes evaluation of prospective customers, telemarketing, processing of purchase orders and fulfilment services, information and tracking of delivery schedules, managing distribution and logistics, customer relationship management services, ac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 1.9.2009, the appellant has been paying Service Tax on the above services as Legal Consultancy Service. The Commissioner also observes that 'I am of the view that the said services are more appropriately classifiable under the category of Business Support Service' but admits the fact that the department have accepted the Service Tax payments under Legal Consultancy Service from 1.9.2009." The fact that all the services that have been received by the appellant are related to patent applications and this is done to ensure maximum protection of their research and development wing and to adhere to global intellectual property standards is not in dispute. Therefore, the amended definition of BSS which is not applicable to the period of dispute cannot be made applicable retrospectively. 7.2 The CBEC clarification vide letter No. 334/4/2006TRU, dated 28-2-2006 in respect of "Business Support Services" reads as follows: - "3.13 Business Support Services: Business entities outsource a number of services for use in business or commerce. These services include transaction processing, routine administration or accountancy, customer relationship management and tele-marketing. There....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eived by the appellant are aptly covered under the Legal Services, the question of classifying them under the Business Support Services does not arise. The learned counsel submission that (successor to Service Tax regime), the 'Legal services' specifically includes 'Legal documentation and certification services concerning patents, copyrights and other intellectual property' as a separate sub-heading emphasises the point that the impugned services clearly fall under the ambit of legal services. 8. The next issue relates to Service Tax liability in terms of Notification No.36/2004-ST dated 31.12.2004 issued under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Rule 2(l)(d)(iv) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and in terms of Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. Since based on our discussions above we hold that the appellant is not liable to service tax during the disputed period under BSS, whether they are liable to pay Service Tax under reverse charge mechanism or not is only academic as there is no denial of the fact that they are liable for payment of Service Tax under Reverse charge mechanism. 9. The third issue relates to invocation of extended period of dema....