Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Ex-gratia compensation for voluntarily resigning deemed non-taxable, ITAT rules it as capital in nature, not income.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The assessee, an employee who resigned voluntarily from Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, received compensation which was accepted as capital in nature by the Assessing Officers after reopening assessments. The Revenue did not challenge this treatment nor initiate any section 263 proceedings, allowing it to attain finality. Relying on the ITAT Delhi ruling in ITO vs. Avirook Sen, where ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules was held not to constitute section 17(3) income, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. It held that the ex-gratia compensation received by the assessee was voluntary without employer obligation under service rules, and thus not taxable u/s 17(3). Consequently, the CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition.....