Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 673

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....epresentative, for the Respondent. ORDER In the present appeal, Appellant is challenging the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- imposed on the Appellant under Section 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. When the matter came up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. As per the records, the appeal was posted on 28-6-2023, 4-8-2023 and thereafter posted today. Hence appeal is taken up for h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther in the SCN nor in the impugned order that Appellant was aware about the presence of Muriate of Potash in the container while arranging lorries for shipment of the goods. Though it is admitted that the Appellant had arranged lorries, same cannot be a reason for imposing penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. It is further finds that while recording statement from the Appellant ....