Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1977 (11) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is application the Commissioner wants the following three questions to be found in para. 5 of the application to be referred to the High Court. "(1) Whether , on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that there was no proper case for the levy of penalty of Rs. 3,92,000 under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act in the case of the assessee ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the income as upheld by the Tribunal was Rs. 5,36,660. Penalty proceedings were taken. The IAC held that the penalty was exigible and levied the penalty of Rs. 3,92,000. The learned counsel for the assessee drew our attention to the order of the Tribunal to be found in paras. 6 to 8. The Tribunal considered the circumstances under which the returned income had been inflated to the higher figur....