Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 247

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mar Ramamoorthy For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Ramanathan For the Respondent : Mr. A.P. Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER An order in original dated 22.11.2022 is assailed in this writ petition in so far as penalty was imposed without taking into consideration the amounts remitted by the petitioner earlier. Upon receipt of show cause notice dated 17.12.2021, the petitioner submitted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hose circumstances, learned counsel contends that 10% of such amounts could not have been imposed as penalty as per sub-section (9) of Section 73 of applicable GST enactments. Therefore, he submits that the matter requires reconsideration only in so far as penalty is concerned. 3. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned senior standing counsel, appears on behalf of the respondent. He submits that the petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e GST enactments. These facts and circumstances justify reconsideration only in so far as imposition of penalty is concerned. 5. For reasons aforesaid, the impugned order dated 22.11.2022 is set aside only in so far as the imposition of penalty is concerned. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the respondent for the limited purpose indicated above and after providing a reasonable opportunit....