2007 (8) TMI 827
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wivedi, Rohina Nath, Avnish Pandey and Umesh Kumar Khaitan, Advs. For Respondents : Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv., Naresh Kumar Gaur, Ashok Kumar Singh, Tara Chandra Sharma, Kishan Datta, Neelam Sharma and Rajeev Sharma, Advs. ORDER 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court whereby the Allahabad....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spension from the date of termination of service till the completion of the inquiry. 3. The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this appeal are as follows: That all the Respondents were teachers in DPS School, Ghaziabad. Their services were terminated. Therefore, they approach the High Court of Allahabad for setting aside the termination order. The learned Single Judge refe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... misconceived and uncalled for. When the Allahabad High Court has already held that the DPS School is not a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and the writ petition is not maintainable, there was no necessity for giving a direction to the CBSE which virtually amounts to granting a declaration in favour of those teachers whose services have been terminated....
TaxTMI