Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition, Upholds Original Order and Resolves Pending Applications After Thorough Document ExaminationSC dismissed review petition after examining submitted documents, finding no apparent error in the original order. The court condoned the delay in filing and rejected the petition, providing a conclusive resolution to the legal matter. Pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. Issues: Review petition challenging an order.

In the judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, the Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan considered a review petition challenging an order. The court first condoned the delay in filing the petition. Upon thorough examination of the review petition, the order under challenge, and accompanying documents, the court found no error apparent on the face of the record or any merit in the review petition that would necessitate reconsideration of the impugned order. Consequently, the court dismissed the review petition. Any pending applications were also disposed of as a result of this judgment. The decision was clear and concise, affirming the original order and providing a final resolution to the matter at hand. Rectification of mistake - error apparent on the face of record or not - delay in issuance of notices - HELD THAT:- There is no error apparent on the face of the record or any merit in the Review Petition, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned. The Review Petition is accordingly, dismissed. Union of India and Ors. Versus M/s Raghav International and Anr.
Customs
2024 (8) TMI 35 - SC Order - 2025 (391) E.L.T. 53 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - SC
Dated:- 16-7-2024
REVIEW PETITION (C) No. 1304 OF 2024 (@ D. No. 16373/2024) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 24022/2023 - -
Customs
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For the Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Venkatraman, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sree Kumar C.n., Adv. Mr. V.C. Bharathi, Adv. Ms. Praveena Gautam, Adv. For the Respondent(s) Mr. Harshadray A. Dave, Adv. Mr. Raghav Jain, Adv. Mr. Tarun Kumar Sobti, Adv. Ms. Vanya Gupta, AOR ORDER 1. Delay condoned. 2. Having carefully gone through the Review Petition, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record or any merit in the Review Petition, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned. 3. The Review Petition is accordingly, dismissed. 4. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2024 (8) TMI 35