2024 (7) TMI 1450

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....GRAWAL, J. Heard Shri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ACSC for the State - respondents. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.09.2020 passed by the respondent no. 3 as well as the impugned order dated 21.08.2019 passed by the respondent no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is engaged in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n mentioned in the documents. Thereafter, proceedings under section 129 of the UPGST Act were initiated and show cause notice was issued. On 21.08.2019, the impugned penalty order was passed, against which the petitioner preferred an appeal, which has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 30.09.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authorities below have not recorded any ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted after the goods were detained and seized. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the Court has perused the record. It is not in dispute that the purchaser was of Chandpur, but the goods were to be consigned to M/s Udit Engineers, Aligarh. When the goods were onward journey, the same were intercepted as in the e-way bill, the place of delivery was mentioned as Chandpur (UP), inste....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with regard to quality and quantity of the goods as mentioned in Tax Invoice, E Waybill as well as G.Rs accompanying the goods. The error committed by the petitioner for not generating E Tax Invoice before movement of goods is a human error. It is also not in dispute that prior to 1st August, 2022 the dealers who were having annual turn over of more than Rs. 20 crores was required to issue E Wayb....