Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Faceless assessment notice by jurisdictional officer invalid. Bombay HC quashes reassessment order & penalties, upholds Hexaware & Vikram Developers.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to notice u/s 148 issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), violating Section 151A. Bombay High Court, relying on Hexaware Technology Ltd., held notices by JAO after Finance Act 2021 are invalid. Considering JAO's lack of authority and non-compliance with Section 151A and related scheme, the impugned notice, reassessment order, consequential demands, and penalties were quashed by allowing the writ petition, consistent with Vikram Developers.....

PrevPreviousNextNext