2024 (7) TMI 1109

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r>Honourable Mr. Justice C. Saravanan For the Petitioner : Mr. I. Romeo Roy Alfred For the Respondent : Mr. N. Dilip Kumar Standing Counsel ORDER In this case, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order, dated 22.03.2024 and the consequential demand order, dated 26.04.2024 and 01.05.2024. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the impugned order has been passed in respect of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was disposed of on the following terms: "6. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent, the Court is of the view that this is a fit case for quashing the impugned order and remitting back the case to the respondent to pass fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law as admittedly the demand ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... stands quashed, shall be treated as addendum to the show cause notice to be furnished which formed the basis of the impugned order. 9. It is expected that the petitioner will reply the show cause notice within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the show cause notice. The respondent shall, thereafter, endeavour to pass a fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law as....