2024 (7) TMI 1104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - -<br>GST<br>HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR AND HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. For the Appellant : BY ADVS. SRI.AJI V.DEV, SRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV, SRI.K.C.MOHANDAS, SRI.S.SAJEEVAN For the Respondents : By Sr. Government Pleader Sri. V.K. Shamsudheen. JUDGMENT DR. A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. This Writ Appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 18.0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....18.12.2017. Aggrieved by Ext. P5 order, the appellant preferred an appeal two years later, which came to be rejected on the ground of delay, vide Ext. P12 order. Without impugning the said appellate order, the appellant approached this Court through the Writ Petition aforementioned on the specious contention that he had erroneously preferred an appeal against Ext. P5 order dated 18.12.2017 whereas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on by the authorities at first instance. It is his submission therefore that the appeal preferred against Ext. P5 order was not maintainable, and hence the respondents have to now pass a final order as envisaged under Section 129 against which alone he needs to pursue his appellate remedy if need be. 5. We are afraid, we cannot accept the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant. At....