Supreme Court Declines to Interfere, Dismisses Petition, and Orders Disposal of All Pending Applications.Rejection of bail - Money Laundering - whether there are reasonable grounds for pleading before and impressing this court that the petitioner is not guilty of such offence, and he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail? - it was held by High Court that The petitioner is hereby granted bail subject to the terms and conditions of furnishing personal bond to the tune of rupees ten lacs to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Jail concerned and surety bond of two sureties of like amo... ... ... Issues:
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal dismissed by Supreme Court.

Analysis:
The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, heard the counsel for the petitioner, including Mr. Suryaprakash V. Raju, A.S.G., Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Mr. T.S. Sabarish, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, and Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma. The Court, after considering the arguments, decided not to interfere with the impugned order issued by the High Court. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. Any pending applications were directed to be disposed of in light of this decision. Rejection of bail - Money Laundering - whether there are reasonable grounds for pleading before and impressing this court that the petitioner is not guilty of such offence, and he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail? - it was held by High Court that The petitioner is hereby granted bail subject to the terms and conditions of furnishing personal bond to the tune of rupees ten lacs to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Jail concerned and surety bond of two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of Registrar Judicial, Srinagar of this court - HELD THAT:- It is not required to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR. Versus MOHAMMAD SHAFI DAR
Money Laundering
2024 (7) TMI 1003 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT - SC
Dated:- 8-7-2024
Special Leave to Appeal ( Crl. ) No( s ). 8017 / 2024 - -
PMLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For the Petitioner : Mr. Suryaprakash V.Raju, A.S.G. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. T.S.Sabarish, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. 1. Heard learned A.S.G., Mr. S.V. Raju for the petitioners. 2. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. 3. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders