2024 (7) TMI 601

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioner : Mr. G. Natarajan For the Respondent : Mr. J.K. Jayaselan Government Advocate ORDER Heard Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-18. 3. The petitioner was iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....refore, the petitioner could not reply to the show cause notice or attend during personal hearing. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given one opportunity to explain the case, as bulk of the demand for a sum of Rs. 1,51,78,828/- is wholly un-sustainable. As far as the other demand is concerned, the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be able to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 9. Having perused the impugned order and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, I am of the view that this is a fit case for remanding the case back by setting aside ....