2024 (7) TMI 305
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandrasekar For the Respondents : Mr. Nanda Kumar Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Mrs. Ragaventhree Junior Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner is before this Court challenging the Order in Appeal No. 77/2014 dated 22.08.2014 passed in A.No.50/2014-TRY (R) by the third respondent/Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Trichy. 2. By the aforesaid order....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng Authority has appropriated the aforesaid sum towards tax liability of the petitioner under Order in Original No.1669/2009 dated 11.11.2009 and the Order in Original No.8/2011-ST adjn dated 30.12.2011. 5. Both the Orders in Originals have been set aside by the Tribunal after the petitioner's appeal against them before the Appellate Commissioner were unsuccessful. As far as the Order in Or....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1-ST is concerned, the petitioner had preferred an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner vide Order in Appeal No.152 of 2010 dated 26.08.2010. 8. The Appellate Commissioner vide Order in Appeal No.196 of 2012 dated 31.08.2012 had rejected the appeal of the petitioner. On further appeal before the CESTAT in A.No.E/489/2012, the petitioner succeeded, as the appeal was allowed by the Tribunal v....
TaxTMI