2024 (7) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner has challenged Order-in-Original No.157/2022-ST, dated 30.12.2022, on the ground that the respondent has wrongly invoked the larger period of limitation under Proviso to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 and confirmed the demand. 2. It is further submitted that the impugned order proceeds on the assumption that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....respective clients, which has however, been disbelieved by the respondent. 4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent on the other hand would submit that there are several disputed questions of facts and therefore, this Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. That apart, it is submitted that the petitioner has an alternate remedy under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994 before ....