2024 (7) TMI 149
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....resh Kumar,. For the Respondents : Mr. Riyaz Padvekar a/w Tanzil Padvekar & Tejal Kharkar,. P.C. 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board on a praecipe as moved on behalf of the petitioner. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant/revenue, we have also heard learned counsel for the assessee. 3. The Writ Petition was disposed of by an order dated 23 January 2024 pas....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....plication. 6. Learned counsel for the assessee would not have any objection for extension of time in terms of what has been prayed for in prayer clause (A), however, in relation to the directions as made in paragraph seven of the order passed by the Court on the Writ Petition. 7. We are also informed that insofar as compliance of paragraph six of the orders dated 23 January 2024 passed by th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n of the order, which would expire on 30 June 2024. 10. It may be observed that the first step to be undertaken by the Assessing Officer was to consider the objections as raised by the petitioner which was to culminate in taking the second step of completion of reassessment proceedings on or before 30 June 2024, which is now being undertaken by the Assessing Officer. If this be so, considering ....
TaxTMI