2023 (8) TMI 1481
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr.DR Order under section 254(2) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This Miscellaneous Application (MA) is filed by the revenue for seeking rectification in order of this Tribunal dated 22/12/2022 passed in ITA No. 94/Srt/2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. 2. The learned Senior Departmental Represe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., only physical cash was to be deposited and not the cash available as per journal entries. The assessee failed to explain how physical cash was available with the assessee on the date of deposit, therefore, the submission taken by assessee falls apart. Since the assessee failed to explain the availability of cash on the date of deposit. There is no finding of Tribunal on such fact. The ld. Sr. DR....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and same cannot be added in the hand of assessee company, thus the assessment order passed by assessing officer was not at all prejudicial to the interest of revenue and the order passed under section 263 was quashed/ set aside. The ld. AR of the assessee further submits that the stand of assessee right from the beginning was that the cash seized from the residence of Director was belonging to as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 4. We have considered the submission of both the parties and perused the record carefully including the order of Tribunal dated 21/11/2022. We find that in the present appeal, the assessee has challenged the validity of order under Section 263 passed by the ld. Pr.CIT, Valsad. The core issue while adjudicating appeal was, if the twin condition of Section 263 whether the assessment order passed by....
TaxTMI