1987 (11) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s not necessary to deal with the contention as to whether the impugned order pertains to maintenance of public order or merely relates to law and order. While the petitioner was detained in Central Jail, Meerut, he handed over a representation addressed to the State Government of Uttar Pradesh, to the Jail Superintendent with an endorsement forwarding a copy thereof to the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs (Internal Security Section), North Block, New Delhi. The writ petition was filed in this Court on September 7, 1987 questioning the validity of the impugned order on various grounds. It has been averred in paragraph 12 that the said representation to the State Government with the request that a copy thereof be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is further disclosed that the representation was immediately processed for. consideration and the Ministry of Home Affairs took a decision on October 16, 1987 to reject the representation. It is also stated that the decision so taken was communicated to all concerned on October 19, 1987 through a wireless message. 3. From a narration of events it is apparent that there was no delay on the part of the Central Government in considering the representation made by the petitioner. The fact however remains that the representation addressed to the State Government by the petitioner and marked to the Central Government remained unattended to till October 19, 1987. Presumably, the copy of the representation was lying at the Secretariat at Luckno....