Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Court held impugned order lacked prima facie case for info called u/s 206 of Companies Act, 2013. No finding of fraud or unlawful conduct by petitioner.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The High Court reviewed a challenge to an order issued u/s 206(4) of the Companies Act 2013, which required the furnishing of details, documents, and information. The Court held that for such an order to be valid, it must establish a prima facie connection between the information sought and the business of the company being conducted fraudulently or unlawfully. The court found that the impugned order lacked this essential linkage and did not demonstrate any fraudulent or unlawful conduct by the petitioner. As the order did not meet the necessary preconditions set out in Sections 206(1) to (3), it was deemed jurisdictionally flawed, leading to the disposal of the petition.....