Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....installation and commissioning work of air conditioning system at hospital complex for 'AIIMS Rishikesh' Uttrakhand. The appellant had entered into agreements with DMRC for design, manufacture, supply, installation, testing and commissioning of Environmental Control System (ECS) and/or Tunnel Ventilation System (TVS) of various underground metro stations in Delhi. They were also engaged in providing services to AIIMS through M/s. JMC Projects (I) Limited. The demand in respect of the services provided to DMRC was dropped by the Original Adjudicating Authority, however, the demand relating to the service provided to AIIMS through JMC Projects was partly confirmed. 2.1 Learned Counsel pointed out that the demand relating to the services pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2014 (33) STR 77 (Tri.- Mumbai). 2.3 He further argued that the demand is beyond the normal period of limitation and there was absolutely no malafides pointed out in the proceedings. He argued that the issue involved a matter of interpretation and in such cases extended period cannot be involved. 2.4 Learned counsel also argued that the extended period of limitation has been wrongly invoked as the issue of classification is purely question of law. He argued that the appellant is fully justified and believing that this is a works contract and did not attract classification as erection, commissioning or installation service. 3. Learned DR relied on the decision of tribunal in the case of Kehems Engineering Private Limited 2016 (41) S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the five member larger bench of CESTAT in the case of Larsen and Toubro Limited 2015 (38) STR 266 (Tri. Larger bench). It is noticed that the said decision of large bench was upset by Hon'ble Apex Court 2015 (39) STR 913 (SC). Thus, the decision in Kehems Engineering Private Limited is no longer valid. 5.1 From the show cause notice it is seen that the arrangement between the JMC and the appellant for the project relating to AIIMS Rishikesh was on following terms: (i) Project cost sheet showing separately working of material and labour portion; (ii) Running Account Bill-wise details showing separately material portion, VAT amount and labour portion charged on actual basis from M/s JMC Projects (India) Private Limited....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the purposes of carrying out, - (a) erection, commissioning or installation of plant, machinery, equipment or structures, whether prefabricated or otherwise, installation of electrical and electronic devices, plumbing, drain laying or other installations for transport of fluids, heating, ventilation or air-conditioning including related pipe work, duct work and sheet metal work, thermal insulation, sound insulation, fireproofing or water proofing, lift and escalator, fire escape staircases or elevators; or (b) construction of a new building or a civil structure or a part thereof, or of a pipeline or conduit, primarily for the purposes of commerce or industry; or (c) construction of a new residential complex or a ....