2022 (11) TMI 1489
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ORDER 1. Heard Sri Aditya Kumar, Advocate for applicant, learned AGA for State and Sri Kapil Tyagi, Advocate for Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3. 2. At the outset number of objections are raised with regard to filing of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as well as the contents of affidavit, however, this Court has ignored the same at this stage as there will be no prejudice to any ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act as he is not an accused. 5. The above submissions are vehemently opposed by learned counsel appearing for Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3. 6. Be that as it may, since applicant has not challenged summoning order, which can be challenged by way of filing revision before Court below, therefore, to deal the challenge of summoning order directly bef....


TaxTMI