Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 47

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Jithandra, AR for the Appellant Mr. Rahul Angadi, CA for the Respondent ORDER The respondents, a 100% EOU, are engaged in export of Inventory Management Services and are registered with Service Tax Department; the respondents have filed refund claims totally amounting to Rs. 51,80,415/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and in terms of Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) dated 14.03.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xus with the output service and therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside to that extent. 3. Mr. Rahul Angadi, learned Chartered Accountant for the respondents submits that it is not open for the Department to question the eligibility of certain services to credit at the time of granting refund as held in Convergys India Pvt. Ltd. 2009- TIOL-888-CESTAT-DEL. He further submits that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....decisions of the Tribunal. He relied upon the following cases: a. Interplex Electronics - 2011 (23) STR 189 b. Emco Ltd. V. Commissioner of Central Excise, CESTAT Mumbai [A/85447-85448/2023 dated 20.03.2023] c. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi V. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. [2023:PHHC:143925-DB] d. Hindustan Coca Cola [2011-TIOL-762] e. Tata Steel Ltd....