1999 (1) TMI 550

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ited company called Kerala Ayurveda Vydyasala Ltd. The appellant has extensive land but very proximally to the Vadyasala of the appellant there existed a kidikidappu, a land which belongs to the appellant. As the site of the said kudikidappu was found to be inconvenient to the appellant, an application was made before the Land Tribunal under Section 75(2) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vant fact which has been overlooked by the authorities below. The matter is therefore required to be reconsidered. 3. Nonetheless learned Single Judge allowed the revision which means that the orders of the Land Tribunal and the appellate authority were set aside. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant contended that the jurisdiction of the High Court in revision is very much limited as indica....