2024 (5) TMI 674

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....v. Ms. Ambika Bharadwaj, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. Suryaprakash V Raju, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Adv ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this case, during the investigation of the offence under the Prevention of Money L....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nexed to the counter affidavit. The document on page 96 of the counter affidavit indicates that a charge-sheet was presented before the duty Magistrate by the Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. In fact, the order on page 96 records that the charge-sheet was presented by the Investigator/Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate, Dehradun to the special public....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 4. The learned Additional Solicitor General, on instructions, points out that in the State of Uttarakhand, a complaint is referred as a charge-sheet and in fact there was no such charge-sheet. Though we have no reason to disbelieve the responsible statement made by the learned Additional Solicitor General, the fact remains that page 96 mentions that there was a charge-sheet presented to the spec....